patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

McDonald’s Withdraws Proposal For Gross Point Road

The chain restaurant withdrew its application to allow a drive-through McDonald’s at 2500 Gross Point Road, at the intersection with Harrison Street.

 

Representatives for McDonald’s have withdrawn their application for a restaurant at 2500 Gross Point Rd. in Evanston, according to a city spokesperson.

The fast food chain was applying for a special use permit to build a McDonald’s at the intersection of Gross Point Road and Harrison Street, and was scheduled for a hearing with the city’s zoning board of appeals on Monday. 

Before representatives withdrew their application, the proposed restaurant came under fire from neighbors as well as Ald. Mark Tendam, who oversees the sixth ward where the McDonald’s would have been located. 

At a meeting of the site plan appearance and review committee in August, Tendam said he believed the McDonald’s might cause traffic problems and gas fumes for neighbors during peak traffic hours, especially after Northwestern University games. He also said the nearest McDonald’s was only two to three miles away.

Two neighbors also spoke up at the meeting, saying there were few supporters among those who lived nearby. Ray Pershing, who has lived in the sixth ward for 30 years, said he was worried about light pollution, while another neighbor said he would never have bought his home just a few doors down if he knew a fast food restaurant would be moving in. 

When Patch polled readers on the subject in July, Evanston residents who voted were fairly evenly divided between those who opposed the proposed McDonald’s and those who felt it would be an asset to the community. 

“This would be hideous. A terrible eyesore that would also cause a lot of traffic day and night,” said commenter “E.” “Not to mention the rough element that these places can bring in – someone was shot at the McDonald’s on Dempster just this past year.” 

Commenter “Marci,” however, said she would like to see more chain restaurants in the area, since she knows what ingredients are on the menu and can choose a meal safely for her daughter, who has food allergies. 

“I think a McDonalds in that area would serve a lot of people working in the area who want a fast lunch,” she wrote. “McDonalds isn't the healthiest option, but when the sandwiches at FoodStuffs are like $9, it would be a convenient and affordable option.” 

Several readers said they believed McDonald’s was a poor choice nutritionally, while others said it should be up to each individual to decide what they ate. 

A representative of McDonald’s could not immediately be reached for comment Monday. 

Related Topics: McDonald's

Earl Weiss

4:17 pm on Monday, November 12, 2012

I support business development, Nutritional issues are not a reason to deny a business a permit. Neither is having another close by or issues with crime at other locations.
This site was a bad choice. Trying to put 10 pounds in a 5 pound sack and the existing Old Orchard Rd, Driveway use the site plan would have been a nightmare and I doubt IDOT would have allowed it since driveways close to controlled intersections are typicaly not allowed for new developments.

Reply

Millie

7:33 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

City Council wasn't concerned about the traffic problems they are creating on Chicago Ave

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joey Fatone

4:58 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Agreed, also since they put in the new lights on the Dempster and Chicago intersection the timing has been way off causing major backups during peak travel times!

Debirag

9:39 am on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

So glad they withdrew the "offer!"

Reply

Stan Wojciechowski

12:38 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I'm glad they withdrew. It would have created a traffic nightmare, not to mention practically destroying the resale value of the nearby homes. Who in their right mind would want to buy a home next to a McDonald's?

Reply

Nathan Elwell

4:32 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The proposal made no sense at all. I think most people are fine living near a business, but not a McDonalds that is open almost 24 hours a. The light, noise, smell, litter pollution would be terrible, then add in the safety and traffic issues. I'm sure the senior facility next door would have had a real problem with it. Plus it would have destroyed the business for the Little Island. Frankly, outside of a strip club or gun store, I can't think of a worse addition to the neighborhood than a McDonalds (or any other major chain fast food restaurant).

Reply

Jim Osburn

4:38 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Instead, what about a "Felony Frank's?" That owner was denied a permit further south, so locating in north Evanston would only be just.

Reply

Millie

5:09 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Although it appears the Council only approves BARS lately

Reply

Fernando

11:38 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

the city council just approved a drive through for the Chase bank one block away from this site. Let's hope McD's doesn't come back and sue the city as they've done in cities across the country.

Reply

Leave a comment