.
Feedback

Teens and Marijuana: Are We Sending the Wrong Message?

Marijuana is easy to obtain, and even easier to justify now that it's legal in some states. Locally, Evanston has decriminalized small amounts. Opinion columnist Christine Wolf wonders what effect all this has on teenagers.

Last week, a friend with older kids mentioned how easy it is to buy marijuana at the high school.

“It’s everywhere,” she said. 

I’ve always heard phrases like, “It’s so easy to get drugs” or “You wouldn’t believe what goes on…” but now that I’m the mother of a high schooler, I’m listening a lot more closely.

Personally, I didn’t take a lot of chances in high school (at least until I was a senior, but that’s another column altogether). As a freshman, I firmly believed alcohol and drugs would only weaken a laser-sharp focus on my two greatest interests: good grades and cute boys. My deepest fear was disappointing my parents and/or getting caught doing something that might jeopardize my future.

My father, on the other hand, kept a Sucrets lozenge box filled with joints in a bathroom drawer. When asked what they were, he tamped out one of his cigarettes and said, “they’re my homemade cigarettes.” I believed him. He recently died of esophageal cancer.

Flash forward thirty years to today’s American high school student, connected to their mobile phones, the Internet and 24/7 BREAKING and sensational news…their entire lives lived in a country at war with others. A life in which the media bombs them with explicit details about Columbine, tsunamis, hurricanes, steroids, and mass shootings — yet hardly a whisper about managing finances or becoming solid leaders. TV programs glamorize the lives of the laid-back and ludicrous, while sales catalogs and billboards portray “peers” living the so-called American dream, all while millions of them wonder when their parents will find a job.

American teenagers’ lives are beyond stressful – and many of them, if they’re not selling drugs to put food in their bellies, are searching for ways to ease their anxiety.

According to a 2011 study from the National Institute of Drug Abuse, about 7.2 percent of 8th graders, 17.6 percent of 10th graders, and 22.6 percent of 12th graders had used marijuana in the month before the survey. Marijuana use declined from the late 1990s through 2007, with a decrease of more than 20 percent in all three grades combined from 2000 to 2007. Unfortunately, this trend appears to be reversing. Since 2006, annual, monthly, and daily marijuana use increased among 10th and 12th graders, according to the National Institute of Drug Abuse. In 2011, for example, 6.6 percent of 12th graders reported using marijuana daily, compared to 5.0 percent in 2006.

Here’s where it gets really complicated. State law in Colorado and Washington now allows adults 21 and over to legally possess up to one ounce of marijuana, but on the federal level, marijuana’s still illegal – leaving law enforcement in those states in a bit of a conundrum. Meanwhile, Evanston aldermen voted last year to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana. Now, any individual found with 10 grams or less will not be arrested. Instead, violators are issued a notice to appear before Evanston’s Division of Administrative Hearings, fined between $50 and $500 and may be ordered to seek drug counseling.

On more than one occasion, I’ve heard kids say they believe drinking alcohol is more dangerous than smoking pot. When asked where they got that idea, the answer’s always consistent: “We learned it in school.” (According to this HuffPost column, the theory holds water). Add in California’s recent 20 percent decrease in juvenile crimetheorized by some to be the result of decriminalizing marijuana possession of one ounce or less from a misdemeanor to an “infraction” — and you’ve got an easy argument for using pot.

However, not everyone agrees that marijuana’s the “safer” vice, particularly among young people. Habitual marijuana smokers (4 or more times/week) who began smoking before the age of 18 demonstrated an 8 point drop in IQ between the ages of 13 and 38, according to a New Zealand study published last year. Those who smoked less often (but who began smoking before age 18) also dropped IQ points in the before the age of 38, and those who abstained from marijuana use actually gained an average of 1 IQ point.

The White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy also opposes marijuana legalization, arguing that marijuana use is harmful and that legalization would actually increase its use and do little to curb drug violence. (Here’s the Office of National Drug Control Policy’s position on legalization.)

So here I am, writing to you, readers, asking what you think. It’s such a slippery slope. To the teens reading this, I’ll give you my honest opinion:

You should NEVER EVER EVER use marijuana. It alters your brain cells. Whether you like it or not, some people in our society will view you as a slacker for using and might therefore interfere with your opportunities. You don’t know how your brain will respond to it (or even what’s mixed in to what you’re buying).  You may hate it or you may love it, but if you love it, trust me, you’ll want more, and you’re very likely to use it so much that you’ll stop getting high from it and then you’ll start using other, stronger things to get that same high. It’s a path you don’t want to walk…

Readers, what do you think?

bowtiesarecool January 15, 2013 at 07:08 pm
Exactly. If there is an enumerated power in the US Constitution that grants the feds the authority to regulate what a citizen eats or smokes, they would be duty bound to support it. Since there isn't, the 10th Amendment says the power belongs to the States or the people. The people decided the state law. Case closed. Enforce the laws that they are sworn to uphold.
Brian January 15, 2013 at 07:41 pm
That is a tricky question to answer. I know many people personally who use marijuana. Most have a similar story to mine (in that their use is either positive or at least benign). I also know quite a few people for whom drug use has completely wrecked their lives, but in every one of those cases marijuana is coincidental, and much of their problem arises either from marijuana combined with other substances (such as alcohol which is WAY problematic), or due simply to the illegality of their drug of choice. I don't know a single person whose life has been up-ended simply from marijuana. Anything can be a negative. How many people die every year as the result of food addiction? We never hear those statistics because it's not as sexy or titillating as drug stories. My point is that marijuana does not take a healthy, happy, normal person and turn them into a lazy pot-head or a violent dope fiend (as is the case with cocaine or meth). People who exhibit those characteristics would be that way with or without marijuana. The problem is that since the days of Harry Anslinger our country has been lied to in an effort to shape public opinion for reasons other than our protection. Marijuana is not illegal because the government is concerned with our safety or our health. You cannot find one case of someone dying from smoking marijuana in the history of the world. But every year we see deaths from alcohol, tobacco, even caffeine. So why aren't those illegal?
Brian January 15, 2013 at 07:47 pm
I would urge you to do some research on the history of the prohibition of marijuana and take a look at what the government has told us over the years, beginning in the 40's and going through the 1990's. You will find that none of their arguments hold water when examined closely, and that drug prohibition has more to do with racism, profit margins, and societal control that it does with a concern for public health. I would say that if you removed the prohibition against marijuana you would find that the majority of cases would be very similar to my own. After all, the last three presidents are admitted pot-smokers, and the current president is famous for it. I notice that their lives weren't ruined (although they would have been had a cop caught them).
lucas January 15, 2013 at 07:54 pm
Government has come a long way with marijuana since some cities and suburbs decided its a good revenue source
Brian January 15, 2013 at 07:57 pm
I would also like to add after reading through some of the comments (and by the way we should be having a discussion; hurling insults does no one any good) discussing the effects of marijuana on IQ; as I said earlier in my comments I obtained a Bachelor's of Science while being a daily user. Prior to using marijuana I was a C average student. I found it hard to focus on studying. After I became a marijuana user (granted in college, not high school; I am NOT in favor of high schoolers smoking pot recreationally), I found that I could concentrate better, and that subjects became infinitely more interesting. I graduated with a 3.8 average, and scored in the top ten percent on the CBASE (yes, I was high when I took it). My degree is in Geography with a minor in Anthropology, heavy influence on science and history. I would argue that I could not have done as well without marijuana.
bowtiesarecool January 15, 2013 at 08:31 pm
Revenue source or not, prohibition is a major cost. What bothers me most about prohibition is that what we are doing is making smart people pay for what we determine to be stupid decisions made by stupid people. If stupid people decide to make a stupid decision to use drugs, why should the smart pay to protect them?
People who don't do drugs have paid $2.4 trillion dollars so far for our "war", but the costs go far beyond monetary ones. We release violent criminals early to make room for drug users. Our homes and businesses are robbed by addicts, so that they can pay black market prices for their fixes. Parts of our cities are turned into shooting galleries, where law abiding citizens can't go, because of drug dealers defending their turf. Limited police resources are diverted from defending us from or the capture of real criminals. Our schools are filled with drug dealers instead of it being sold by licensed vendors as we do with legal products. We've turned selling plant matter into a multi billion dollar industry, guaranteeing that there will be those that sell it, and because it is illegal, those that do will only be the most violent among us. Prohibition makes us all less safe, and the only justification that prohibitionists have is that legalization would make those who decide to use drugs less safe. Yet they still make that decision, it isn't stopping use.
Robert P. Mark January 15, 2013 at 09:35 pm
Christine - Parents will never see these kinds of topics the way people who don't have kids will, I think. That perspective just changes you.
As a parent sure I'd be trying to figure out how to talk to my daughter about drugs or booze. But I'd also want to know why she tried them in the first place. Without understanding that, we'll never figure out what we're up against. Was that last joint a cry to fit in with other seniors? Or is this simply the first time I've caught her at it recently and this is a long pattern of trying to zone out -- as Christine said -- to cope with some tough part of life?A drink here and there is one thing. Someone who's under the table four nights a week is a whole other problem. Same thing on the joint. I wouldn't tell my daughter it's OK to smoke in our house or even on the back porch. Now if I miss her trying and I'm watching, that says one thing. BTW, to that person's comments about parenting, I think good parents are always on the lookout for odd behavior. They may not call attention to everything, but they're looking. If my daughter's smoking on the back porch and neighbors see it and say nothing though, or I'm clueless about what's happening, or even worse, I see the behavior and assume it's just kids and that for sure it will all work out, then we've got a couple of really big problems. And for the record, if my neighbor saw my daughter smoking a pipe on the back porch, I'd want them to tell me ... 4th amendment or not.
bowtiesarecool January 15, 2013 at 09:54 pm
Robert: The crux of the matter with prohibition is your last sentence. Of course you'd want them to tell you. But, and I ask this in all sincerity, as a father of two myself, would you want them to tell the police? Would you rather have our government decide if and how your child is reprimanded for this act. Smoking marijuana is a finite "crime". It doesn't hurt anybody else, it won't hurt your daughter permanently. A marijuana arrest, however, is infinite. She could be denied access to university entrance. A police record. Incarceration may expose her to who knows what on the inside. An infinite punishment for a finite crime is the definition of injustice. The police don't know what kind of kid your daughter, or any body else's daughter, is when they pick them up. They don't care if it is the kids first time doing anything wrong, and they chose to do it on your back porch to avoid getting into any serious kind of trouble, or if the kid ran out of crack, and was getting high on her way to burglarize the neighbors house. They will treat them all the same, arrest, booking, detention, trial, punishment. Taking away the ability of a parent to make decisions about what is best for their child is anathema to freedom. Prohibition is unjust, it's anti-freedom, anti-American, puts our kids at more danger, and has zero positive benefits. If it stopped kids from using drugs, less of them would than did in 1937 before it was made illegal. The fact is, more do. It's counterproductive.
Anon January 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Teens "partying" is a big issue right now, if what I'm hearing about some of the Christmas break shenanigans is true. Teenagers, by nature, make bad choices. You can arm them with all the information you have your hands on, tell them the choices they should be making, threaten them with the drug test kit you keep in your cupboard, but guess what? A good many of them will still make some bad decisions. That doesn't make them bad kids, and it doesn't make us bad parents. Trust me-with one kid on the way to college and another on the way to high school, I've seen a lot of good, smart kids from strong families do really stupid things. It's like they turn 16 and check their brain at the door. Consequences are important, but need to be tempered with the knowledge that these are kids and their brains don't work. Take away their drivers license, make them pay big fines (out of their own money!), require community service, but a criminal record for being caught smoking in the woods at 16 is overkill. My preference would be that my own teens will steer clear of alcohol and drugs and I hope they do (but I know that bad choices have already been made). But if I had to choose, I would much rather my teen smoke pot than drink alcohol. They are less likely to end up in an emergency room, less likely to exhibit reckless behavior and more likely to help the local economy through increased sales at the 7/11.
IMHO January 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
I have called the Evanston police to report the neighbors kids smoking pot in the backyard and alley. They arrived, talked to the kids, and left. The kids took their party into the garage.
IMHO January 15, 2013 at 10:40 pm
The kids in my neighborhood who have been arrested for possession of marijuana and alcohol violations (age 17) have seen no consequences. Their parents continue to pay for their cell phones (even though the kids won't answer when the parents call), provide a weekly allowance (the kids have never had a job), drive them anywhere they want to go, and let the kids stay out until dawn. Bad kids? Bad parents? Bad schools? All of the above I suspect.
FlyingTooLow January 15, 2013 at 11:01 pm
@ IMHO...
Young people only know what they are taught. They come into this world a blank page...write on it as you will. That is what they know...it becomes the 'path' they will follow through life. My Mom and Dad ran a tight ship. No, there was no physical abuse. But, my siblings and I knew where 'the line was drawn.' We loved and respected our parents...what they said was law. Example: no alcohol until age 21...marijuana was practically unheard of in my era. So, now kids need to be taught, no pot until 21. These 'kids' I am reading about in this thread...they seem to be without 'direction.' They are running wild. That was not allowed in my generation. You ask, "Bad kids? Bad parents? Bad schools?" My vote is not 'bad parents'...but, parents who are not providing these little guys with proper instructions on how to behave in society. They have to learn somewhere...proper instruction begans at home. Not only 'begins,'...but is 'demanded.' At least, that's the way I see it. And, yes, I know what opinions are like.
FlyingTooLow January 15, 2013 at 11:34 pm
@ Brian...
All excellent testimonials, Sir. Thank you for sharing, Hugh Yonn
Annonymous January 16, 2013 at 12:27 am
Things to consider - for the children:
1. Cannabis is illegal for children either way, prohibition or with legalization. 2. Access to Cannabis is difficult if it was legal like alcohol. 3. Access to cannabis is easier and abundant under prohibition. 4. Drug dealers don't care about the children. 5. It is more profitable to get children using more expensive drugs rather than cannabis. If you are a dealer up-selling will be what you do. 6. Cannabis is about as addictive as coffee. Tobacco is more addictive than heroin. 7. Education works better than propaganda, lies, and fear mongering, because kids are smart. 8. We tried prohibition for over 40 years. We know this road well. Give legalization a chance. 9. Reefer madness is pure propaganda. Lies do not garner support. 10. Prohibition costs to society far outweighs any benefits. Legalization is a sane model and allows for harm reduction. Look at tobacco for an example.
bowtiesarecool January 16, 2013 at 12:42 am
IMHO: you've seen no consequences..... Ok, so what are you saying, that you wish bad consequences on people, because they choose something you don't? That you want them to suffer, because they might have some fun? That's called "sadism". If marijuana use is so harmful, aren't those harms consequences? If it's really that harmful, isn't that enough? Why do you think they need to be harmed further? Or are you saying that it doesn't harm them enough on its own, and you want to guarantee that they are REALLY harmed? You sound like a very kind, loving type of person.......
IMHO January 16, 2013 at 01:20 am
Call me old-fashioned (and a sadist) but after the second arrest I think the kid should be punished.
lucas January 16, 2013 at 01:31 am
IMHO
You don't think the $50.00 fine and a shame on you is enough
bowtiesarecool January 16, 2013 at 01:38 am
Well, if you think that the drug use itself isn't harmful, and that they should just be punished because you want them to be, what do you call that?
Maybe you've never been arrested, and don't understand that there are actually consequences. Something happened. They don't arrest you and then say "have a nice evening". They were booked, given a court date, and something happened. Are you saying you aren't aware of anything happening, or that nothing happened? How do you know the outcome? Do they have a record that is going to result in difficulties gaining employment? If that is the case, they are going to be paying less in taxes for the rest of their lives, correct? So the community will have less revenue. And you want to spend more money incarcerating them, as well? Because the drug use itself wasn't punishment enough, you want everyone to pay to punish them more? Is that your solution? Do you think that arresting people for this has reduced the number of users? Are there fewer users today than there were in 1937, when it was first made illegal? What do you want to see?
lucas January 16, 2013 at 01:43 am
bowtiesarecool
I believe the Evanston ordnance is a ticket for $50.00
Esoteric Knowledge January 16, 2013 at 04:49 pm
Oh, you don't think I have it, Jennifer?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/14/marijuana-study-teens-pot-iq-drop-flawed_n_2473936.html
Esoteric Knowledge January 16, 2013 at 05:04 pm
Yes, and most jobs are violating the 4th Amendment. It is bigotry. It has nothing to do with safety, because American society is just fine with people having a drink after work. The goal is to destroy a class of people.
Esoteric Knowledge January 16, 2013 at 05:11 pm
Actually, the threat is smarter people--this is why no government can tolerate it, governments want to keep people stupid. Accusations of stupidity is psychological projection from the stupid people who feel threatened by individuals who seek out knowledge and consciousness expansion.
Esoteric Knowledge January 16, 2013 at 05:24 pm
Hey Jennifer, too bad there are no articles discussing the American Government's maleficence in violating civil rights, violating the 4th Amendment, violating the Declaration of Independence, violating the freedom of speech, violating the freedom of religion, the Government occupying the position of God, the meaning of life and where God is. :)
Christine Wolf January 16, 2013 at 06:58 pm
While the pros and cons of alcohol are widely known, it's still illegal to use it under 21 years of age (unlike many countries in Europe). Back to the crux of the article: What's your opinion on TEENS using marijuana?
lucas January 16, 2013 at 07:16 pm
The City Council said it was ok if TEENS use Marijuana. Obviously they have no interest what others think
bowtiesarecool January 16, 2013 at 07:30 pm
Ahh, but that wasn't the "crux" of the article. The crux of the article was what kind of message are CO and WA "sending our kids" with their most recent marijuana laws. Those laws didn't make marijuana use by those under 21 legal at all. That's just an excuse to justify keeping it illegal altogether. Alcohol isn't legal for those under 21, as you said. What kind of message does that send our kids? Is that telling our kids that they are free, in fact encouraged, to use alcohol? No, it doesn't. In fact, binge alcohol use is at an all time low, and our kids, for generations, have said that purchasing alcohol is more difficult than it is illegal drugs. You are now disregarding your entire article. What does a law, legalizing its use for adults, have to do with teen use at all, other than it makes it more prevalent? Do you have some sort of belief that prohibition has reduced use? There were fewer users in 1936 than today? Nobody is that delusional, are they? Prohibition has been the most successful marketing campaign in history. 100,000% increase in use in just 75 years. Can you think of an existing product that has seen larger growth in use than that?
Jim January 16, 2013 at 07:36 pm
As I said above. teens use marijuana at theor own risk. If a teen's physiologic response is adverse and he/she is killed or seriouly injured or goes to jail, that person is selected out of the gene pool through what I call sociological natural selection. Another example would be someone who uses a drug (any drug) and gets into a fight because of it and is killed, he/she has been selected out. We as a society have pretty much stopped physical natural selection through medical techniques but as far as I can tell it is nigh impossible to stop syupidity and poor judgement. Risk is relative and there is enough of it in the everyday world without doing something unnecessary and narcicisstic.
Debbie January 17, 2013 at 12:02 am
I am one of those that agree with making pot legal and regulating and taxing it like we do cigarettes. There are a whole lot of substances like synthetic marijuana, pharmaceuticals (think about how many kids pop ADHD drugs when they don't medically require it) and alcohol that are legal and available everywhere. Is the issue here that pot should or should not be legal? Because for every pro stance article we can find one on the opposite side. But, if you truly want to break down the issues at the high school, then alcohol is a much larger issue than pot. I responded to Christine on Facebook with this as well, but ETHS is primarily broken down into those that drink and those that smoke. There are some that do both and, of course, there are some that have issues with other drugs. However, in response to LM's comments above, do not think for one second that your kid can't go purchase alcohol from a liquor store or get into a bar. Ask the kids where they purchase their booze from (through a back door in the alley) or what infamous Evanston bar STILL lets underage kids in by hopping the fence and giving the bouncer some cash or with the worst out of state fake ID's ever. Or where the kids could stop before school in the mornings or on lunch and buy a shot of most anything for a few bucks. Drinking is illegal for them and yet they find a way to get it. So, yes, there are, in a sense "tequila dealers".
june shellene January 27, 2013 at 07:54 pm
I hope it's of interest to everyone to understand the CIA's drug trade is alive and well. James Corbett is only one of many sources on this. Do your own research though. Always best.
http://www.corbettreport.com/the-cia-and-the-drug-trade-eyeopener-preview/
june shellene January 27, 2013 at 08:03 pm
Another thought, is if we honored our children...if we didn't work so hard at amputating their right brain...their source of creativity and all the really cool things human beings have at their disposal, they wouldn't be dying to get the hell out of the hellish mental state our "educational" institutions pushes them into while marginalizing the kids who refuse to sit down and shut up and learn how to parrot back mostly uninteresting information. Here's a few interesting clips. In the first, a recent high school valedictorian gal pulls the veil off the whole dumbing down system we so foolish call education.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M4tdMsg3ts The second clip is a woman who watched, as a government insider, as public schooling had its heart and soul ripped out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezTIYd5UFRY

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Evanston Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Lisa S. June 12, 2013 at 04:52 pm
Can you post the contact information so we can make reservations? Also, any idea what the glutenRead More free menu will be or is it a surprise?
Festus McMoron June 12, 2013 at 04:09 pm
diane, i'm sick of all you peoples whining and crying that blacks are picked on. there are manyRead More great black families in evanston. you lump every black into one group. we want the gangbanger trouble-making thug out of evanston. do you feel safe living here. i don't step 2 feet outside my home without locking it. after this knifing incident, i'll have my windows rolled up and car doors locked when i see a black male. the thugs have ruined it for all the good ones.
Jordan S. Zoot June 13, 2013 at 02:07 pm
Festus....being a bigot and scared of your shadow doesn't accomplish anything....that's why theRead More newly passed concealed carry law ought help....dude pulls a knife he gets peekaboo at the barrel of a .45 and lets see how things turn out....I get cut and his pumpkin implodes......better guess he turns tail and runs...reenforcing the rule that you don't win when you bring a knife to a gun fight
Patch reinstates deleted accounts! June 12, 2013 at 02:48 pm
What? Based on your spelling, grammar & punctuation, are you old enough to be posting on Patch?Read More Just wondering...
Procrustes' Foil June 12, 2013 at 02:57 pm
You're right, Patch. This post is barely literate.
Jordan S. Zoot June 13, 2013 at 08:59 am
The writer of the post is illiterate....that is clear. The Evanston Police, in general, do a greatRead More job in this community. There ought be a new category created specifically for membership in a gang that has demonstrated committed acts of violence...it goes back to the first smart thing which Mark Kirk ever said which was locking up each and every one of the 18.5K members of the Gangster Disciples. The second thing that can be done is that each and every law abiding Evanston resident that is legally able to do so should avail themselves of the right to obtain a new Illinois Concealed Carry Permit for a handgun. An armed society is a polite society.
Brooke Roothaan June 11, 2013 at 01:19 pm
Starting June 20th, 2013 at 7pm. All welcome.
Ellen robinson June 14, 2013 at 06:31 pm
I would like to come but I am confused. It says Wednesday, but the 20th is Thursday. Which day isRead More it?
Brooke Roothaan June 15, 2013 at 10:52 pm
Thursday. Whoops. Thanks for catching this!
Ignatius Williams June 9, 2013 at 11:30 am
This post is borderline-illiterate. You also fail to say where these shows are going to be held.
Phil McGovern June 9, 2013 at 01:24 pm
thanks for the heads up. I thought most people would simply click on the link. little did I know....
Phil McGovern June 9, 2013 at 01:29 pm
Thanks for the heads up. Little did I know. Thought most people would simply click on the link !